Used 2015 NissanNV200 SV Van Compact Cargo Van

  • VIN: 3N6CM0KN6FK693004
  • Stock: 19T0387A
Odometer
106,508 miles
Fuel Economy
24.0/26.0 mpg City/Hwy
Exterior Color
Fresh Powder
Interior Color
Gray
Body/Seating
Van Compact Cargo Van/2 seats
Transmission
continuously variable automatic
Drivetrain
front-wheel
Engine
2.0L I-4 cyl
Nissan NV200
  • AutoCheck

Highlighted Features

  • Remote keyless entry
  • Heated door mirrors

Detailed Specifications

Dealer Notes

CLEAN AUTOCHECK REPORT NO DAMAGE, ONE OWNER, LOCAL TRADE IN.
Fresh Powder 2015 Nissan NV200 SV FWD CVT with Xtronic 2.0L 4-Cylinder DOHC 16V


If you're not driving a Kraft Nissan, you paid too much.

KBB.com Consumer Reviews

Kelley Blue Book - KBB.com
Overall3.6Out of 5
  • Piece of junk!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    By marty on Saturday, August 02, 2014

    1.0
    Things you should know about the Nissan NV200 before buying one! I have owned this van for about 13 months & have 25,000 miles on it. The suspension bottoms out so easily I have bent all 4 rims @ almost $200.0 each (for plain black rims) & lost all 4 wheel covers. Nissan knows they have a problem because the new VN200 don’t come with full wheel covers any more. I had to replace 2 tires at 18,000 miles because of cupping. Discount Tire said the only reason the tires will cup is because of bad suspension. Nissan said I need to rotate my tires every oil change. The only place you can get the tires is the dealer @ $214.00 each for cheap Continental Tires. At 25,000 I had to replace the other 2 tires because they just worn out. I got 75,000 miles out of the tires on my E150 van. Other problems are the side window is slopped so bad that your arm slides down, sun visor doesn’t cover the top 4 inches of the side window, back up camera only sees the bumper, voice control is very bad, cup holders are too deep, radio changes channels by itself, ABS light & Back door comes on sometimes & gas tank is too small. The blind spot mirror is a joke. This van is the biggest piece of junk man has ever made! I highly recommend you look elsewhere for a good van
  • Great in everything

    By H&M Distribution on Sunday, November 03, 2013

    5.0
    With full load and in the city 26.3 MPG. very convenient with 2 sliding doors and back door. Spacious cargo space. Easy to drive in tight areas when delivering. Very low noise for a cargo van. easy to reach anything while standing out side because of the 2 sliding doors and the back door. I love the blue tooth connection to the phone.
  • Decent economy Van

    By ZaneD7620 on Tuesday, February 17, 2015

    4.0
    Having always driven an Astro cargo van, i had my eye on the transit connect for some time, but never really liked it. When the NV 200 came out it seemed to be a better fit for me.-We can argue specs on which is a better van but it really is just personal preference and specific application. Biggest selling points for me were MPG, price and the 60/40 rear door-and interior just "felt better". On the minus side, the sunshades are awkward. they don't extend far enough on the side window and they hang down to much to see through the front window. they don't stay up, had them replaced and the replacements do the same thing. Another downside is its not fun to drive at high speeds when its windy. it gets a bit squirmy. (when its unloaded at least) The cargo area being unfinished (no insulation or coverings) can make the van noisy when it rains. (think tin can) Its an economy van, so power and performance is not going to be one of its strong points-i feel its adequate considering i average 24-25mpg. with lowest mileage recorded at 22.9 and highest at 28.1. Just like any truck, when loaded, there is a decrease in acceleration power and braking distance increases...you just have to drive more carefully. 80% of my driving is little or no load so its fine for my purposes, but if i were to max out the carrying capacity on a regular basis, i may look for a bigger van. The CVT transmission is a bit different from the standard automatic and may take getting used to. Yes there are pros and cons from a technical perspective, but again it comes down to personal preference. Its less "sporty" feeling,(remember its a cargo van) but seems a bit smoother not changing gears all the time. I am neutral on recommending this van. I don't dislike it, but i just recommend if in the market for a cargo van to do your research and get the van that you feel the most comfortable with.

New Arrivals

  • 2011 Nissan Murano SV SUV

    2011 Nissan Murano SV SUV

    • Please Call
    View Details
  • 2001 Nissan Maxima Sedan

    2001 Nissan Maxima Sedan

    • Please Call
    View Details
  • 2010 Nissan Altima 2.5 S Sedan

    2010 Nissan Altima 2.5 S Sedan

    • Please Call
    View Details
  • 2015 Nissan Sentra SR Sedan

    2015 Nissan Sentra SR Sedan

    • $13,132
    View Details